Jump to content

Seed parent 'Tarnok'


Howard Snocken

Recommended Posts

Just to confirm the fertility of Sarracenia leucophylla cv.'Tarnok' as

seed parent - if this has not already been done - here are some photos

that I took a few weeks ago but didn't have time to post.I pollinated three

flowers and was able to harvest three lots of seed. I'm not expecting any

spectacular offspring though.

TarnokFertHJS061.jpg

TarnokFertHJS062.jpg

TarnokFertHJS063.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I pollinated each and every stigma I could identify - they were many and variously formed -

and repeated this a couple of times. Not all of the resulting ovary chambers bore seed of a healthy

appearance and not all chambers were properly formed as can be seen in the last photo above the

more normal parts of the capsule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The flower deformation is likely a recessive trait, so probably not. Self-pollinating any offspring may result in the next generation having deformed flowers.

Howard should be able to tell us in ten or fifteen years time... :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Aidan has stated it may be a long time before we see any of 'Tarnok's special traits

appearing in its possible offspring ( if at all ) - so don't hold your breath! :roll:

However, out of curiosity and in hope of some pleasant floral surprises at some point

in the future I'm sure I'll be as happy as a Cheshire cat if and when any of these seeds

germinate.

As for the flower - I like it, usually. It depends on the particular example for me.

Here's a nice one ( in my opinion ).

TarnokflowerHJS06.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

what plant was the pollen donor ?

Joel

The pollen donor(s) were S.purpurea ssp. purpurea f. heterophylla ,

a particularly fast maturing 'normal' S.leucophylla from Conecuh

which flowered in its third year from seed and a hybrid of unknown parentage

involving S.leucophylla and possibly S.purpurea and S.oreophila - unknown but particularly handsome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howard,

Nice dissection of the ‘Tarnok’ flower. Great photos, beautiful specimens. The seeds look perfect and viable.

For final proof that ‘Tarnok’ is fertile, at least as a seed parent. Give us a quick update when you get germination.

Brad

Ventura California

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howard,

Nice dissection of the ‘Tarnok’ flower. Great photos, beautiful specimens. The seeds look perfect and viable.

For final proof that ‘Tarnok’ is fertile, at least as a seed parent. Give us a quick update when you get germination.

Brad

Ventura California

Thanks Brad, will do!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The flower deformation is likely a recessive trait, so probably not. Self-pollinating any offspring may result in the next generation having deformed flowers.

Howard should be able to tell us in ten or fifteen years time... :roll:

WOW! Will it really take that long?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The flower deformation is likely a recessive trait, so probably not. Self-pollinating any offspring may result in the next generation having deformed flowers.

Howard should be able to tell us in ten or fifteen years time... :D

WOW! Will it really take that long?

Yep :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Howard should be able to tell us in ten or fifteen years time... Laughing

well...I hope that I(we :) ) will be able to tell you before 10-15 years :D since I made my hybrids flowered in 2 years...unbelieveble but true!!

To what I see I am another that have succesfully pollinated the Tarnok...by the way with another leuco...

...I start to pray :D

By the way:

VERY VERY VERY WONDERFUL PICS!!!! :oops:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To what I see I am another that have succesfully pollinated the Tarnok...by the way with another leuco...

I have to ask why? Crossing 'Tarnok' with any plant other than S. leucophylla would have been the logical choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. Maybe you'll end up with a leucophylla with a flower intermediate between normal and the Tarnok mutant? Could be a nice plant in there maybe.

I'll be as happy as a Cheshire cat

I like the English colloqialisms Howard, especially since you're German :oops:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. Maybe you'll end up with a leucophylla with a flower intermediate between normal and the Tarnok mutant? Could be a nice plant in there maybe.

No chance! :D

...Howard, especially since you're German :D

Alexis - Prepare to be embarrassed... :oops:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to ask why? Crossing 'Tarnok' with any plant other than S. leucophylla would have been the logical choice.

why logical :?:

Well....the cause is now expressed : for the last two years I've been making 187 differenrt hybrids...huge work!! One of those hybrids is in my avatar :D This year instead I concentrate myself to make pure plants (flava x flava, leuco x leuco...), so I would like to have a my personal "new different Tarnok" hoping that the polen donor will give his strong shape and colurs to the offspring.... add to the flower deformation of the Tarnok :D

No chance! Laughing
why? I assure that among the hiybrids I've seen things that no human being have seen before :lol::lol::lol: ....if you wrote that about the recessive character..well I will wait for other 6-7 years... :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi frangelo,

Thanks - and well done too! :lol:

My record time from seed to flower was about 23 months for a S.x catesbaei

grown under lights to begin with, so I believe you!

Did your 'Tarnok' produce its seeds this year?

I pollinated mine to produce both a simple and a complex hybrid cross

and also pure S.leucophylla seed, whereby the latter was by far the most

successful union in terms of number of seed produced.

Alexis - are you prepared ? :lol:

I'm from Hampshire actually - :lol: no offence taken though :D:D:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to cross S. 'Tarnok' with this;

mutant.jpg

The flower above is NOT S. 'Tarnok', but a mutant S. purpurea which Phil Sheridan has growing at Meadowview Botanical Research Station in Virginia. I took the photograph on the ICPS Conference trip to Meadowview in June this year.

As far as I'm aware, this is the only known plant of this variant, so won't be widely grown for a while. Phil has selfed the plant this year, so perhaps some of the offspring will bear the same floral trait.

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to cross S. 'Tarnok' with this;

Vic

I had thought that too Vic after having seen your ? photo a while back, but

thought that it was probably not able to produce pollen either. I take it that

that's not the case then...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Phil Sheridan has successfully selfed that flower, then the structure is more normal than the S. 'Tarnok' flower. Stigmata are present in S. 'Tarnok' but there is no sign of male organs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...