Jump to content

D. omissa/nitidula complex revised


Andreas Fleischmann

Recommended Posts

Dear Pygmy Drosera fans,

Those of you who want to follow the latest news in Pygmy taxonomy will have to re-label a few of your plants in your collection ;).

"A revision of the Drosera omissa/D. nitidula complex (Droseraceae) from south-west Western Australia" by Allen Lowrie and John Conran, Taxon 56 (2), May 2007, p. 533 – 544.

The authors are working on Pygmy Drosera taxonomy since a while, here some results of their studies:

Drosera omissa is reinstated (Diels' holotype in Berlin) and is found to be conspecific with D. ericksoniae. Therefore D. ericksoniae N.G. Marchant et Lowrie will now have to be treated as a synonym of D. omissa Diels. (And all hybrids involving D. ericksoniae will now have to be called "D. omissa x ..." as a result.).

Lowrie's D. nitidula ssp. 'omissa' (or D. nitidula 'var.?' in the CP database) is described as a new species, D. patens Lowrie et Conran.

The type of D. nitidula is determined in this paper, D. nitidula ssp. leucostigma and ssp. allantostigma are given specific rank now. I.e. Drosera allantostigma (N.G. Marchant et Lowrie) Lowrie et Conran and Drosera leucostigma (N.G. Marchant et Lowrie) Lowrie et Conran.

The paper contains a morphological comparision of all 5 species (including line drawings by Allen Lowrie, identical to those published in Carnivorous Plants of Australia Vol. 2 & 3), SEM photographs of gemmae and seed of all 5 species, chromosome photos and chromosome numbers (all species have 2n = 14).

Thus it's now 47 species of pygmy Drosera currently known. Let's see what further investigations in this group of sundews will show ;).

All the best,

Andreas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang! i just lost a D. patens then... :D

very good, and i like all the new and more interesting names! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thus it's now 47 species of pygmy Drosera currently known. Let's see what further investigations in this group of sundews will show ;).

and another couple on the way shortly.................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on Sean, tell us what you know, you cant just leave it at that!

I would if I could. Sorry but you'll have to wait a bit. :oops:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

See here-

http://www.naturebase.net/content/view/951/482/1/1/

The formal description of one of them. :D

I'll see if I can get some permission to post some photos.........

Mine are growing OK so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In simple terms, what should I call my omissa, erricksoniae, and allantostigma? Does this also apply to the Lake Carburup or Badgerup or occidentalis?

AF002901.jpgcarburup

AF002801.jpgnitidula occidentalis

AF002701.jpgerricksoniae

IMG_0035-1.jpgallantostigma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is the point of the paper:

D. ericksoniae --> D. omissa

D. nitidula subsp. allantostigma (or D. nitidula subsp. nitidula var. allantostigma according to the Australian gvt) --> D. allantostigma

D. nitidula subsp. leucostigma --> D. leucostigma

D. nitidula subsp. omissa --> D. patens

This is applied to all the hybrids involving these species, as a matter of course.

But what is the specific difference between D. nitidula and D. patens?

By the way, thanks for the link, Sean!

Edited by Khelljuhg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a real pitty with this renaming that Rica Ericksons' name gets lost. She was (and still is as I know) the great lady who published the first CP-book particular on Australian CP (Plants of Prey) including a "key to the species", and also on Australian Triggerplants and Orchids. She really deserves that an Australian plant gets her name, not only because "Plants of Prey" was the original which inspired Lowrie to write his books in a similar pattern. Of course Lowrie used two kinds of writing for the species: first D. ericksonae in his Vol. 2 and later D. ericksoniae in his Vol. 3, however D. ericksoniae was mostly used. Surprisingly neither Erickson nor Lowrie/Conran noticed and mentioned that this species is able to move its marginal tentacles very rapidly, they are able to bend in only five seconds. Actually Irmgard and I measured it as the fastest of all pygmy Drosera to which we had access.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...