cp addict Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 Rumours has it that a new Hamata look a like species with lots of hair has been released in Europe! Does anybody know where i can get one? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chesara Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 sweet looking plant but its going to cost ya thats for sure.I think BE released them not many and there small. Cheers Julian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobble Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 Any links to pictures of this yet?. Bobble Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmie Hansen Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 I would like to know the name.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SydneyNeps Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 As far as I'm aware, it is hamata, I suspect it will be given a varietal or location name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilex Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 http://forumpc.celeonet.fr/forum/ftopic6490.php really beatiful thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoTon Posted June 22, 2005 Report Share Posted June 22, 2005 As far as I'm aware, it is hamata, I suspect it will be given a varietal or location name. Let's have a naming contest! My entry: N. hamata var. "Mammoth Testes" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chesara Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 lets see N x Hamata "Furry sack" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olly_k Posted June 24, 2005 Report Share Posted June 24, 2005 what is that strange variety of moss growing with the plant?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmie Hansen Posted June 24, 2005 Report Share Posted June 24, 2005 or just N.hamata var. Pilosus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stairs Posted June 26, 2005 Report Share Posted June 26, 2005 Just to clarify, it is of course Nepenthes hamata; Ch'ien Lee found it while climbing a different peak in Sulawesi to the one from which most cultivated plants originated. His original pictures are larger and far better, but I forget where they're posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treaqum1 Posted June 26, 2005 Report Share Posted June 26, 2005 IF someone could find the original posting that would be great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stairs Posted June 26, 2005 Report Share Posted June 26, 2005 Actually, I was mistaken, this is the only picture, but there's more explanation from Ch'ien himself in the thread in question, which you can find HERE. The only important text is pasted below - the remaining four pages of the thread in question are largely the ooh-aah responses you'd expect. Hi All,Thought people might be interested to see this stunning new variety of N. hamata which I recently photographed in Sulawesi. It comes from a mountain quite far away from the type locality of N. hamata and shows that this species has a good bit of geographical variation throughout its range. Compared with the variety from Gunung Lumut (which is probably the source of all the plants currently in cultivation?), the pitchers of this new form are more robust and entirely red with a dense coating of rusty brown hairs. Also, the bristles on the lid are not as numerous nor branched. In all other vegetative respects it matches N. hamata very well. Best regards, Ch'ien and: Hi Joachim,An interesting point, however I think the reason for this belief is due to the great difference in the upper and lower pitchers of this species. Although Turnbull & Middleton cited the specimen Kurata used in his description, they used a specimen of their own collection from the same mountain for the type of N. hamata. Kurata's material (Eyma 3572) consisted only of upper pitchers and these showed the unusual long-clawed peristome. T & M's description included the lower pitchers and noted their similarity with N. tentaculata. For those who have seen the plants in the wild or been able to grow them to flowering size, it is readily apparent that the tentaculata-like lower pitchers and the long green upper pitchers with the clawed peristome belong to the same plant. Although it is certainly possible that N. hamata occasionally hybridizes with N. tentaculata, I haven't yet seen any plants in the wild which might represent this cross. The red hairy plant in the photograph merely represents a geographical variant of N. hamata, and it does NOT occur at the type locality (sorry, not revealing any localities for now). The plants in this population appear to have very little variation, although peristome color is occasionally yellowish-green between the teeth. Upper pitchers of this variety are generally orange in color and although they do have a nicely toothed peristome, the claws are not as long as the G. Lumut variety. The picture was taken with a Nikon D70, Nikkor Micro 60mm, and tripod. Best regards, Ch'ien Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treaqum1 Posted June 26, 2005 Report Share Posted June 26, 2005 Thanks Stairs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.