kltower Posted July 1, 2008 Report Share Posted July 1, 2008 (edited) Although N. tenax was published in 2006. It was shrouded with secrecy to protect them from collectors. Up until a week ago, the only known picture is this tiny photo from Captive Exotics: http://www.captiveexotics.info/images/18.jpg Then last week, Stewart McPherson started a thread in CPUK (Carnivorous Plants in Habitat) with photos of CPs of Cape York showing N. mirablis, N. rowanae and N. tenax. Hallelujah a proper photo of N. tenax at last! http://www.cpukforum.com/forum/index.php?s...mp;#entry221291 But I believe N. tenax was discovered at the same time N. rowanae was "rediscovered". In the article titled AUSTRALIAN NEPENTHES DISCOVERY OF THE CENTURY.... http://www.exoticaplants.com.au/welcome.as...3&newsid=19 at Exotica Plants website detailing Rod Kruger expedition to Cape York, Rod wrote of a slender mirabilis -like pitcher with extra large lid he called Form E ..... However we did and the lower pitchers were slender and cylindrical and were half pink and half yellow/green in colour similar to typical N.mirabilis colouration. The unusual thing we noticed on the pitchers was that the lid seemed too large to fit the pitcher mouth! We called this plant ?form E?. There is a small photo of Form E in the article. But you can have a larger photo of Form E from the JCPS website http://jcps.hp.infoseek.co.jp/var.E.jpg All the photos have one thing in common and that is All the pitchers have lid seemed too large to fit the pitcher mouth. So tenax is Form E and Form E is tenax. Don't you agree!!! Why the secrecy? If you can get to rowanae, you can get to tenax. More info please Dr Clarke / Rod!!! Choong Edited July 1, 2008 by kltower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.