bearphant Posted March 29, 2014 Report Share Posted March 29, 2014 which is the correct name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoLongFairWell Posted March 29, 2014 Report Share Posted March 29, 2014 It used to be a sub species but is now just D. auriculata. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearphant Posted March 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2014 Ok, thank you. I thought it was the opposite ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoLongFairWell Posted March 29, 2014 Report Share Posted March 29, 2014 I was going by the comment at the top of here http://www.cpphotofinder.com/drosera-auriculata-2534.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dieter Posted March 30, 2014 Report Share Posted March 30, 2014 Most people I am aware of consider these two different species, not just subspecies. However, there is no right or wrong (even if some may claim so), as there may be different interpretions leading to different results. The most recent publication on this topic - at least the one I am aware of - was written by Robert Gibson et al: http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/SB11030.htm CheersDieter 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.