alipe Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Hello everybody, two years ago I bought from Gert (Extreme-Plants) a N. Thorelli, and I would like you to help me to find out if it's true Thorelli. Here are some pics: Lower pitcher Upper pitcher Thanks everybody Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thez_yo Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 (edited) It kind of looks like one of those newer species, like Nepenthes bokorensis. ...or maybe andamana? I was looking at the lineup of pitchers featured here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepenthes_andamana Edited May 28, 2010 by thez_yo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alipe Posted May 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Hi thez_yo, Thanks for your answer. But I think that the peristome of N. andamana looks different Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mags Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 There have been a couple of threads about this that i've read and the general concensus is that the true N. thorelli is not in cultivation. The nep experts will be on soon to give you a much better answer tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alipe Posted May 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Hi Mags, I´ve read that too, that´s why I´m asking. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milos Sula Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Hi Alipe, no this is not real N.thorelii. It does have different shape of pitchers. More like N.viking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcello catalano Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 That's a strange plant! From the first photo I would say it's bokorensis, but it might be a hybrid with bokorensis or it might have nothing to do with bokorensis at all! :) You should ask Gert about the history of this plant, if it came from the States, from Europe, from SE Asia, how long ago, from which nursery etc... Also, a picture of the whole plant, where we can see leaf shape and attachment, would help... By the way: it's THORELII, not THORELLI :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alipe Posted May 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 By the way: it's THORELII, not THORELLI :) Upsss , sorry for changing its name Thanks Milos and Marcello. I´ll ask Gert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Schoeneberg Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Hello, thats not an viking i think. The lowers look like bokorensis, and the uppers a bit like albomariginata i think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milos Sula Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 I have said that N.thorelii pitchers are similar to N.viking. This is not N.viking, of course.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nepenthe777 Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Hi Alicia, your plant is lovely one!!! The fruits of my red ventricosa grow very fast, I think It will be a viable and fantastic hibrid: 1º colorfull pitchers , ventricosa influence. 2º low humidity resintence for male , thorelii, smilessii, bokorensis or hibrid. 3º tolerance to very low temp for ventricosa influence. Made in Spain! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
An D Smith Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Hi Alicia I can't help with the ID of your plant, I'm afraid but I thought I would say that the real N. thorellii IS in cultivation, from seed collected by Stewart McPherson a couple of years ago from the type locality. I doubt that any of these plants have matured yet and are producing upper pitchers though. Most plants labelled as N. thorellii in cultivation have turned out to be N. smilesii. I hope the mini maxima is doing well Cheers Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcello catalano Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 (edited) Andy, do you mean that Stewart found plants and seeds of N. thorelii in the wild and kept that secret to all of us for 2 years, publicly and privately, without even mentioning that or showing the photos of his discovery in his books???? Aren't you getting confused with some other species? :) ... Edited May 29, 2010 by marcello catalano Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alipe Posted May 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Hi Andy, the plants you sold me are growing quite well. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sockhom Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 (edited) Hi AliciaI can't help with the ID of your plant, I'm afraid but I thought I would say that the real N. thorellii IS in cultivation, from seed collected by Stewart McPherson a couple of years ago from the type locality. I doubt that any of these plants have matured yet and are producing upper pitchers though. Most plants labelled as N. thorellii in cultivation have turned out to be N. smilesii. I hope the mini maxima is doing well Cheers Andy Dear Andy, You sure getting confused with another species. Stewart asked me to write a paper on the long lost thorelii for his forthcoming books. Ke knows very well the species is not in cultivation. On top of that, Stew clearly mentionned in PitcherPlants of the Old World (volume 1) that N. thorelii has not been found (at the time he wrote the books at least). I hope you are doing well my friend ;-) Cheers, François. Edited May 29, 2010 by Sockhom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
An D Smith Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Dear All... My most humble apologies. I am indeed confusing N. thorellii with N. treubiana . Francois, I remember your depressing posts only too well. I'm off to hide in the greehouse for a while Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Schoeneberg Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 I have said that N.thorelii pitchers are similar to N.viking. This is not N.viking, of course.. Oh, I'm sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alipe Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hello, just wanted to add a pic of the last pitcher From now, the only thing new I know is that the plant come from Thailand. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcello catalano Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Good, then I have some suspects :) -can you post a picture where the whole plant is visible? -take a magnifying lens, and you will notice that on tendril and pitcher there are many very little hair (present in all species). Can you see some similar hair (probably longer) around the base of the leaf too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alipe Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hi Marcello, yes, the tendrils, the pitcher and the base of the leaf has lots of small hair. It´s impossible for me to take a pic of the whole plant, it is too long. I made one of the end. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcello catalano Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Great, thanks. I would say it's definately N. andamana, congratulations :) Do you have a picture of the flower? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alipe Posted June 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Thankyou very much for your identification, Marcello Here you have a pic from the flowers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.