Jump to content

Ceph Hummer's Giant vs "Big Boy"


gardenofeden

Recommended Posts

Hi Stephen and co

I grow Hummers' Giant and have noticed a few distinguishing characteristics. The non-carnivorous leaves are almost circular in shape and never grow into a pointed leaf as in other clones. Also the actyual pitchers tend to be more egg-shaped and slightly smoother.

The largest example of this I have ever seen was at Hampshire Carnivorous Plants a few years ago and this particular specimen had only one pitcher, but what a pitcher. Almost four inches tall it looked more like a Nepenthes villosa!

Cheers

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stephen,

I bought it from a nursery.

It may well have been Sarracenia Nurseries.

( Definitely not a Swiss one) ;)

Fred

PS Yes I have a few plants, I do like them to get to a good size before passing on though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£19.99 for a small Cephalotus

Nice if you can get it

Fred

huh... Is that worth it o_O;;

I remember a couple of years ago i bought one from someone here for under £10...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Pitty we dont have any "giant" forms of cephalotus in Aus...One day i suppose!

Just seeing that price for a small plant, wow , a small plant in Aus would cost about $5-$10 aus which is about uuuummmm...3-6 pounds!

Do they really grow as gaint forms for you guys?Or are they just bigger plants that have earned themselves a reputation as a giant form?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi All

Having just re-read the original article in the ICPS journal about Hummers' Giant, I found it interesting that John Hummer said that anyone with a different large clone of Cephalotus in cultivation can safely assume that the clone is the same as his. Apparently there were originally several plants which were distributed to various growers before they grew up and nobody knows how many there were. The person who supplied mine also said the same thing, that he believed there was only one giant clone in cultivation and that it is being paraded under different names.

What do other people think?

Cheers

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again

Further to my previous post

The article was submitted by John Hummer on 10 May 2000 but his plants were originally received in 1986 from a Steve Beckwith in Australia. He goes on to say that he distributed several of these among close associates (USA only?).

At the time of the article (2000) he says that he will register it as a cultivar??

Cheers

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...