Jump to content
Brought to you, and supported by, The Carnivorous Plant Society

maverick

Full Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    147

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by maverick

  5. S. purpurea "tina"

    in Sarracenia

    Posted

    Hi Maniac,

    Thanks for the explenation,

    I'm happy it isn't published, because the whole goal of the cultivar registration system is to preserve the Unique clones and this one isn't because it is just like 'sorrow'

    I've also mailed Bob Ziemer about it and he told me the following:

    S."Tina" is not registered. Although published in 2002, Jan Schlauer (the official ICRA registrar) has not picked it up, either because he is unaware of the publication, feels the description did not meet the registration criteria, and/or had never received a request to register it. Jan could provide a more complete and official explanation. Anyway, to answer your question, S. "Tina" should be in double quotes until it is registered as an official cultivar. -Bob-

    So this is indeed NO cultivar :sun_bespectacled:

    Thanks for the help!

    Regards,

    Laurens

  6. S. purpurea "tina"

    in Sarracenia

    Posted

    I personally think this is just a X catesbaei hybrid between some veinless purpurea(either the burkii veinless or the ssp. purpurea veinless) x flava rugelii.

    This would also result in this kind of offspring.

    But I think all the people over here where pretty convinced that this was no pure purpurea as mentioned in the cultivar description.

    I now only hope to find out the truth behind the tina.

    But, I asked this before: Tina is oficially published in that book, does this mean this plant now is a oficcial cultivar? and so can be registered with the single quites?

    Thanks a lot!

    Regards,

    Laurens

  8. S. purpurea "tina"

    in Sarracenia

    Posted

    Hi Adrian,

    The picture shown over here came from this site: http://utricularia.net/sonstiges/stefan_le..._2008/index.php

    The picture was taken in 2008 in the collection from Stefan Lenssen.

    I think this is the 'Sorrow' he grows

    Or he must be growing the tina clone as well.

    I've send Freddy de Conick another letter last wednesday, still no reply... I think this will end with a dead end.

    If there are any updates from my side I will let you all know.

    Regards,

    Laurens

  19. S. purpurea "tina"

    in Sarracenia

    Posted · Edited by maverick

    I will check my mailbox every hour, hoping to find a letter fro Freddy, I really hope he can confirm this.

    But as Tina is officialy published, it now is a real cultivar?

    I think if Freddy doesn't send me a reply the trace will end dead...

    Does anybody know anything about dna comparising?

    Because I really want to solve this if there is no other option, since I don't want to find out all my efford resulted in nothing.

    Thanks!

  23. S. purpurea "tina"

    in Sarracenia

    Posted

    I've not given them any evindence to prove it really is 'Sorrow', So now they may indeed be selling it under the wrong name.

    I've only told them I personally was convinced it was the same plant, based on the look of it.

    But even I will wait to put 'Sorrow' on my growlist until I have any evidence for it.

    I'm still awaiting my reply from Freddy de Coninck to help me further with this.

    I will keep you updated.

×
×
  • Create New...