Jump to content

dudo klasovity

Full Members
  • Posts

    510
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by dudo klasovity

  1. Hi Heather!

    Thank you for the comment. The day temperature peaking at 45C was really a bit too high for them. I noticed some of the leaves have burnt. So I bought PHILIPS TURBO ENERGY SAVER TORNADO lightbulb (23W which equals light output of 130Watt). It is much cooler so now the temperature is 35C top and the light is very intense because the bulb is 4cm from the plants. The plants love it and came back to an active growth! The bulb is a bit expensive but has 8 years warranty and a great performance so I think it was worth buying it.

  2. I was gone from the campus for over 2 months and I made a mistake to have my roommate take care of some of my petiolaris drosera. To be fair- he tried his best but knows as much about CP as fish does about bicycle racing. In other words- an apocalypse. Here is what they look like now. I grow paradoxa petiolaris and kenny there. What he did he (perhaps accidentally) moved the light about 20cm away. In the picture you can see the further positioned drosera was not getting enough light:

    DSCF0005-1.jpg

    DSCF0004-5.jpg

    Other thing he did was he poured so much water in the terrarium that one could drown an elephant there. Kenneallyi likes fluctuating water level and now she was almost drown there for 2 months and most of the leaves are dead now.

    Now what should I do? With the petiolaris and paradoxa maybe giving them more light will be satysfying?

    As for kenny should I give it a dormancy? ( I definitelly decrease the water level).

    I removed the regular light bulb (100W) and replaced it with SUNGLO light. The temperature during the day reaches 43C (used to be 35C with regular lightbulb). Do you think it is too hot for them or can they withstand such heat? (Night temperatures drop to 22C).

    Thanx for any comments! :-)

  3. Well for this pilot experiment I used a protein shake readily available in any gym/wellness centre. I have been using some myself for sports activities but then I read the composition label and noticed some of the components match the substances that are digested by CP's enzymes (as they are by animals). So let me point out that it is not MY mix nor is patented by me in any way. The protein shake (which in fact is not a protein shake but a blend of over 80 chemical compounds and majority is not a protein compound). Needless to say this mix is not perfect because there are so many ballast chem. substances that may or may not harm the complexity of digestion mechanism and consecutive process (pH as most important factor). It has been proven that major compound in this mix (sacharides) is of no use (nepenthes) and even harmful(drosera) for the plants. There is a need for significant improvement of such blends.For me this was just to make sure that this really works and I think that with some reservation it might be said that in some cases it really does....Luckily I have some gadgets like HPLC available to carry on to this research and find out the enzymatic nature of each genus and therefore to design an organic fertilizer for each particular CP genus. It is more than clear that this is a long run experiment and the verification of its outcome is time consuming (thankfully not very expensive). When the effects of particular mixes are shown then mixes of chemicals will be made and later put on market. Unfortunatelly at this time i am consumed by work on finalizing my PhD so the CPs must wait...for now....If anyone has some time on his/her hands I would be more than happy to cooperate:-)

  4. Mobile: I suppose i could have used powder form but I didnt want to. Neps and sundews cannot digest poly and oligosugars because there are no glycosidases enzymes to break them down. See my mix contains a lot of sugar so I feared when using a concentrated form I would kill the pitcher (or the plant) by creating perfect media for fungus attack. The exactly same hapenned with sundews. So i tried a solution instead. Maybe if the pitcher has plenty of concentrated juices inside a bit of powder would work just as well. Dont think the amount of water in the pitcher makes a big difference but i might be wrong. Or if I used pure aminoacid mix there would be no problem for use on drosera as well:-)This area need far more extensive research than this:-)

  5. I grow my plants in terrarium but this contribution to the forum is not as much about terraria as it is about artificial feeding of CPs so if needed please move it to more apropriate department.

    Some time ago I have been thinking about how to keep the plants vividly growing even when the conditions arent very favorable (e.g. winter) when there is not enough prey/insects. It is well understood that CP are green plants capable of photosyntesis and that supplementation of N P and other lacking elements via digestion of prey is not necessary requirement for their survival. Of course a nourished plant grows and propagates better than struggling one. The importance of feeding the plants varies from one species to another and is maybe the most obvious in the case of tuberous droserae when they need (in very short time) grow rapidly bloom and create seeds or extra tubers. Without enough prey some of them only form a terrestrial rosette and then go back to dormancy without flowering and further propagation. All of the CPs are onlu capable of digestion of very simple molecules. So the prey body's components have to be broken down to its primary structures (aminoacids glycides fatty acids phosphosacharides etc). Depending on the CP genus not all of the components can be used for nourishing the plant. Enzymes available are the crucial determinating point. Well I designed an experiment to perform and determine whether there is a way to nourish the plants artificially to boost their growth and sustain wellness.

    As we know the anorganic fertilizers work mostly on the principle of addition of nitrogen in ammonium or nitrate form (or both in case of ammonium nitrate) phosphorus in form of sec. and tert. fosfates....potassium as KNO3 or KCl..and so on....in other words in a form unacceptable for most of CPs.

    Organic fertilizers are mostly urea guanidine calcium cyanamide (nitrolime) or other compounds with little tollerance of Cp to such fertilization.

    So i decided to try a different kind of food supplement for CPs...the very same that is used for animals.

    I took a powder mix of some aminoacids (lysine proline glutamic acid valine isoleucine serine tyrozine etc) fatty acids (stearic lignoceric acids and myristic acid) glycosides glycides and coenzymes and minerals such as Mg and vanadyl sulphate..)

    This i prepared dilute solution from and fed it to the plant once a week for two months.

    I only used Heliamphora and Nepenthes for this first experiment.

    In case of Heliamphora (minor) I had two plants coming from a cluster division of one plant...therefore genetically identical and they were grown together under the same conditions except one was fed the solution and the other was just as a referrence plant. The pictures show that both plants grew the same amount of new pitchers and that the frequency of growth did not increase but the growth of each new pitcher of fed plant was more rapid and the traps distingtively better developed:

    DSCF0060.jpg

    DSCF0059-1.jpg

    In case of Nepenthes i used common cheap hybrid x Ventrata. The young plant was fed for one month the very same nutrients. The next pitches was much bigger then the previous created by plant and actually bigger than tha plant itself:

    09230060.jpg

    09230025.jpg

    It would be nice to see whether this works with slow-growing nepenthes and other carnivorous genus.

    I havent tried this with pinguicular nor sarracenias (dormancy). But i have tried with droseras. The food was fed in solid/powder form directly onto the leaf. (D. capensis D.slackii D peltata) but before the food could be digested the affected leaf was a subject to rot/mould attack. This I think happens because droserae genus dont possess glycosidases-enzymes making the digestion of sugars possible. Since there were sugars present they remained undigested and therefore an inducement for fungus growth.

    I think with the proper analysis of enzymes in plants it is possible to design a harmless fertilizer to be mixed to meet each plant`s requirements:-)

    Sorry for the long lecture I just wanted to share my results and thought it might be of interest to some.

    Also I would like to ask you whether anyone had tried this before i did and what was the outcome of the experiment:-)

    P.S. Apologies for my English for it is not mu native tongue....

  6. I grow my plants in terrarium but this contribution to the forum is not as much about terraria as it is about artificial feeding of CPs so if needed please move it to more apropriate department.

    Some time ago I have been thinking about how to keep the plants vividly growing even when the conditions arent very favorable (e.g. winter) when there is not enough prey/insects. It is well understood that CP are green plants capable of photosyntesis and that supplementation of N P and other lacking elements via digestion of prey is not necessary requirement for their survival. Of course a nourished plant grows and propagates better than struggling one. The importance of feeding the plants varies from one species to another and is maybe the most obvious in the case of tuberous droserae when they need (in very short time) grow rapidly bloom and create seeds or extra tubers. Without enough prey some of them only form a terrestrial rosette and then go back to dormancy without flowering and further propagation. All of the CPs are onlu capable of digestion of very simple molecules. So the prey body's components have to be broken down to its primary structures (aminoacids glycides fatty acids phosphosacharides etc). Depending on the CP genus not all of the components can be used for nourishing the plant. Enzymes available are the crucial determinating point. Well I designed an experiment to perform and determine whether there is a way to nourish the plants artificially to boost their growth and sustain wellness.

    As we know the anorganic fertilizers work mostly on the principle of addition of nitrogen in ammonium or nitrate form (or both in case of ammonium nitrate) phosphorus in form of sec. and tert. fosfates....potassium as KNO3 or KCl..and so on....in other words in a form unacceptable for most of CPs.

    Organic fertilizers are mostly urea guanidine calcium cyanamide (nitrolime) or other compounds with little tollerance of Cp to such fertilization.

    So i decided to try a different kind of food supplement for CPs...the very same that is used for animals.

    I took a powder mix of some aminoacids (lysine proline glutamic acid valine isoleucine serine tyrozine etc) fatty acids (stearic lignoceric acids and myristic acid) glycosides glycides and coenzymes and minerals such as Mg and vanadyl sulphate..)

    This i prepared dilute solution from and fed it to the plant once a week for two months.

    I only used Heliamphora and Nepenthes for this first experiment.

    In case of Heliamphora (minor) I had two plants coming from a cluster division of one plant...therefore genetically identical and they were grown together under the same conditions except one was fed the solution and the other was just as a referrence plant. The pictures show that both plants grew the same amount of new pitchers and that the frequency of growth did not increase but the growth of each new pitcher of fed plant was more rapid and the traps distingtively better developed:

    DSCF0060.jpg

    DSCF0059-1.jpg

    In case of Nepenthes i used common cheap hybrid x Ventrata. The young plant was fed for one month the very same nutrients. The next pitches was much bigger then the previous created by plant and actually bigger than tha plant itself:

    09230060.jpg

    09230025.jpg

    It would be nice to see whether this works with slow-growing nepenthes and other carnivorous genus.

    I havent tried this with pinguicular nor sarracenias (dormancy). But i have tried with droseras. The food was fed in solid/powder form directly onto the leaf. (D. capensis D.slackii D peltata) but before the food could be digested the affected leaf was a subject to rot/mould attack. This I think happens because droserae genus dont possess glycosidases-enzymes making the digestion of sugars possible. Since there were sugars present they remained undigested and therefore an inducement for fungus growth.

    I think with the proper analysis of enzymes in plants it is possible to design a harmless fertilizer to be mixed to meet each plant`s requirements:-)

    Sorry for the long lecture I just wanted to share my results and thought it might be of interest to some.

    Also I would like to ask you whether anyone had tried this before i did and what was the outcome of the experiment:-)

    P.S. Apologies for my English for it is not mu native tongue....

  7. HI!

    I have bought this drosera marked as d. capillaris. I am not sure about it though. Some people say that it looks a lot like spathulata. I tried to take a picture of flower but the winter weather here in Slovakia has been so shite and depressing that I almost forgot what the sun looks like....trying to say that the flower never opened. I only know it is pink colour.

    Here is a picture of rosette:

    DSCF0051.jpg

    Could someone tell me what it is? Thanx:-)

  8. My pygmies produced a lot of gemmae this autumn and after collecting it I decided to resume their growth by placing them under artificial lighting and they took off:-)

    D. nitidula var. allantostigma

    DSCF0081.jpg

    D. pulchella

    DSCF0077.jpg

    D. callistos

    DSCF0074.jpg

    D. palacea

    DSCF0069.jpg

    Little plants of palacea produced from gemmae of previous plant this fall

    DSCF0068.jpg

    D. slackii

    DSCF0065.jpg

    D. peltata finally started its vertical growth

    DSCF0047.jpg

    P.moctezumae

    DSCF0054.jpg

    D. capensis

    09230008.jpg

  9. Hi!

    Since my not very favourite season- winter came and therefore the amount of sunlight my plants cavet is rapidly diminished I had to build some haven for my plants until the weather improves. I was wondering whether there is enough light in the terraria:

    09070045.jpg

    First one serves as propagating place for pygmies. The lighting is provided with two 13W T5s:

    09070040.jpg

    09070035.jpg

    09070042.jpg

    As you can see some of the pygmies started to grow from the gemmae. I read that they need tons of light in order to thrive but dont know if the light I have will do...

    The second terrarium is for some adult pings droseras and helis:

    09060003.jpg

    09060014.jpg

    It is equipped with two 8W T5s. Is this enough?

    Thanx:-)

  10. HI! :-)

    Could anyone please help me with identification of this drosera species? Maybe it is too soon to tell since the plants are only 6 months old but i dont like having strangers in my collection. It looks like D. dielsana to me...

    (Sorry for the blurry pic):

    09070028.jpg

    Thanx! :thank_you2:

  11. Hi,

    thank you for the important information. Some time ago, I put ascendens to much cooler conditions on east-oriented window but since it is wintertime i think maybe it was not getting enough light. So the above-soil part of the plant died away. But i checked for the roots and they are strong and look ok. As you said the pot is maybe too small. So i thought maybe i can take it out of the small pot and use the roots for cuttings and lay them on the top of the sand/paet mix in larger pot.

    Rubrifolia for some reason died completely. Montanas and helis are growing like crazy though.

  12. Hi:-)

    i have a question about drosera slackii. I try to propagate it using root cuttings. It takes about 2 months to get some new plants and also the number of plants is low. For example when i use 7 2cm cuttings i get 3-4 new plants when i am lucky. is there any trick or better working procedure? (I have tried many substrates, different cuttings and various air humidity with no amendment of the outcome). Here is the picture of new plants(1st pic bottom right) and some other droserae as well:

    DSCF0035.jpg

    hamiltonii

    DSCF0007.jpg

    DSCF0004-2.jpg

    aliciae:

    DSCF0048.jpg

    peltata

    DSCF0015-1.jpg

    capillaris

    DSCF0028.jpg

    kenneallyi

    DSCF0059.jpg

    paradoxa

    DSCF0062.jpg

    montana

    DSCF0053.jpg

    mannii and lasiantha gemmae

    DSCF0056.jpg

    I am beginning to think that drosera slackii does not carry a name of Mr. Slack but its name comes from its slacky nature:-)

  13. Hi Dieter!

    Your sundews look absolutely fab! WoW! The tuberous one in the other thread as well! Love your plants. My pulchella x omissa did the same thing with the plantlet in the flower stalk but mine didnt produce any secondary flowers. When i get more space i definitely will get some tuberous droserae- your thread is very motivating!

    Good luck growing! (obviously you dont need luck -but still:-)

  14. Hi Heather:-)

    From my experience it really doesnt matter whether you divide the paradoxa cluster "surgically" or just savagely pull the plants apart. I simply pull them apart and then use carborafin (active surface coal used in chemistry to purify compounds) to "disinfect" the potential wound and plant them in substrate right away. I noticed that this simple procedure rapidly reduces the occurrence of rotting. It is understandable since the plants are placed into very hot and humid environment after the division. Here are some plants that used to be siamese and now are in individual pots (2 weeks after repotting they really took off and 3 of 4 are about to produce flowers:-)

    DSCF0003-3.jpg

    I havent tried this with any other petiolaris sundew but I am about to make identical experiment with kenny:-)

×
×
  • Create New...