Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 07/20/2018 in all areas

  1. 10 points
    Dennis, thank you for taking the time to explain this at length to all the members on here. I have known you and Phil for many years and trust you both without question. The new(old) or ex chair person or woman ,i don't know. She might have good intentions but going about it the way she has,i.e forcing people to resign is wrong. How can she dissolve a society that is prospering? O.K anyone can moan about this or that but it worked. It sounds like it was a bad decision to let her in at all, i can see a point of bringing in new blood to run a newer more modern society but to kick out the very bones that has made it what it is,is wrong. You need some experience behind you when you take over something like this and should be willing to listen to all points of view from everyone and not just bulldozer your own thoughts straight in regardless. ada
  2. 7 points
    NOT A LEG TO STAND ON.springs to mind. Anyone who values the society should have nothing to do with her,anyone who thinks they were appointed by her to do a job should resign, they are there illegally. i think she saw the money! A step backwards but the society will come out of it better and stronger.
  3. 6 points
    To say I am stunned by the allegations made by Annette would be a serious understatement. I left the committee a few months ago after running the seed bank for almost 12 years and the committee described by Annette is not the committee I recognise. All of them have worked hard to ensure that everything is done properly and above board. Every member of the committee has done their job with the interests of the membership at heart. I would love to see evidence as described by Annette, so far I believe she has produced none. Many of the current committee have been in their positions for many years and it is just wrong to treat them in this way. They give up their time to keep things running smoothly. Okay there are problems, journals are late being one of them, but they have done and still do their best. The chairman as far as I can tell has no authority to demand committee resignations. It must be a full committee decision and I believe Annette has overstepped her authority in demanding that some long standing committee members resign. If they have brought the society into disrepute in any way let us see the evidence and the members can decide the way forward with a proper vote.. The entire committee have agreed that they have no confidence in Annette as the chair of the society and that is an agreed vote and therefore a legitimate committee decision. As Annette is no longer chair, she no longer has the right to a trustee position either. The people she took on as trustees without committee consent should be removed as trustees until this is sorted and settled. They may be suitable as trustees, but they need to be legitimately selected. If Annette believes she has the support of the members, then let us have a proper vote at the AGM in May, when she has the right to stand against whoever takes her place temporarily for now. This is your society. It is not up to Annette to decide it will be dissolved. If Annette and her friends want to start a new organisation, they are welcome to do so, but it seems they want to do that and take your money with them. I do hope that should it come down to a vote at the AGM, that you will all support your very loyal, long standing committee. All committee records are open to member scrutinisation. Please do ask to see evidence, not just from the committee who have my full support, but from Annette who so far is full of accusations without showing anything to back it all up. Sheila
  4. 6 points
    Hi If you don't know me my name is Dennis Balsdon and I was Mrs Bell's predecessor as Chair of the CPS. In the past few years: We have hosted the European CP Exhibition and Exchange. We have hosted the International Plant Society Conference at Kew Gardens which was attended by Sir David Attenbdorough and over 160 of the leading botanists and growers from around the world at which we made a profit in excess of £5000. We have introduced new CP events and shows at RHS Wisley, RHS Harlow Carr, RHS Rosemoor, RHS Tatton Park, The National Botanical Garden of Wales and at Birmingham Botanical Gardens. Members of the committee have given over 200 talks at garden clubs and at other institutions including the RHS. For the last two years we have been invited to the RHS Chelsea Garden Show at which we won silver gilt medals. We have made grants from our conservation fund to 6 organisations both in the UK and overseas which are involved in plant/habitat conservation. We took over the CPUK forum when it was in danger of folding. We have tried to promote our relationship with the UK's commercial growers. We have maintained our membership numbers at over 300 for the last ten years at a time when many specialist plant societies are shedding members. All this has been done by a dedicated group of volunteers who give of their time, expertise and in many cases their own money in order to enable the Society to achieve its objectives. Some of these volunteers have served on the committee for decades. For part of this time Mrs Bell filled a number of minor roles on the committee. We have always had difficulty in recruiting new members onto the committee (particularly for the position Chair) but in the last year we have managed to recruit a new membership secretary, a new seed bank organiser and a new conservation officer (Loakesy). Late last year I decided that due to my advancing age and health issues it was time that a younger person took over from me. Mrs Bell volunteered to be Chair and was elected by unanimous vote of the remaining committee. I was elected by the committee to be a non-executive trustee of the Society. Mrs Bell was appointed as a trustee by virtue of being the Chair. Following her appointment as Chair I pointed out to Mrs Bell administrative issues which I thought needed to be improved and she had the support of me and the committee in making those improvements. Mrs Bell then undertook a review of the Society's procedures but rather than make those changes in cooperation with the committee she decided to write to the Charity Commission in which she claimed that the Society was so badly administered that she wished to dissolve it and form a new organisation to replace it. She has stated on many occasions that the Commission had approved this action but has not been able to produce evidence of this approval. She then proposed that a Special General Meeting be held with the aim of dissolving the Society. It was at this stage that opposition to her arose from the committee members. She then persuaded me to resign as a trustee implying that this was supported by the committee. This was not true. She also persuaded Tim Bailey (my predecessor) and Flick Foreman (a past treasurer) to also resign as trustees. The only other remaining trustee was Phil Wilson (the current treasurer) who refused to resign. In this letter she made a number of accusations to the effect that the Society was so badly administered that it should be dissolved and replaced by a new organisation, that there were financial irregularities, that decisions were improperly made and that we had no records of those decisions. Taking these points in turn: I and the committee accepted that some changes to our administrative practices needed to be made; there have been NO financial irregularities, all expenditure has been made in furtherance of the Society's objectives, receipts are held for all expenditure and the accounts are published at the AGM and End of Season meetings; the committee is spread out across the country and 99% of all decisions are made via email. We have these emails going back at least 10 years. During her time on the committee Mrs Bell took part in these decisions. We have the minutes of all AGMs except for 2017 and 2018. This was a recognised oversight. As a trustee Mrs Bell had access to the the Society's file on the Charity Commission website. She changed the password to this file so that the other trustee could not access it. Despite not having any agreement from the Charity Commission for her actions she wrote to the Commission stating that she was appointing four new trustees (one of whom is not a member of the Society) and that she and they would form a "board" to takeover the Society. She has repeatedly stated that she has approval for this action from the Commission but has but is unable to produce it despite many requests. The committee passed a vote of no confidence in Mrs Bell and removed her as Chair. She was replaced as Chair by Phil Wilson who will serve until we can find permanent replacement. She has ignored this vote and now describes herself as de facto chair and de facto trustee. Her actions have brought the Society into disrepute to the detriment of its reputation, its members and the achievement of its charitable objectives. I know that the committee is determined to defend the Society. Dennis
  5. 5 points
    hi Fabrizio
  6. 5 points
    Morning Stephen, i know people do all the work voluntarily. the comment i made was more at Annette wanting to dissolve the society and give the money to something/somewhere/somebody else. If none on the existing members or commitee were members of this new set up because they hadn't been invited to join or being elected because they hadn't being made aware of this infighting. who would have got the money then?? technically only the members of the new club or society she had made up would be able to share the money out and with her being a trustee,it smells very fishy to me. Iam all for moving forward and modernisation but done properly,if she has nothing to hide why hasn't she provided the evidence or answered any questions put forward? ada
  7. 5 points
    Statement from the Committee of the Carnivorous Plant Society Registered Charity 281423 WITHOUT PREJUDICE This is a copy of the email which we will send to our members very shortly. The Carnivorous Plant Society has been suffering an unprecedented attack from inside its very structure. We have been fighting to retain the society in its current form but there are people, supposedly with the best interests of the society in mind, who are fighting an insidious battle to destroy everything that we have. The following is a descriptive statement of events that have occurred within the committee of the CPS in the past five months. This is not yet resolved and the threat is still very active. We wanted to wait until this is completely resolved before informing you, the membership but recent events including a post on Facebook has forced us to issue a statement to you, the members. You have the right to know what is going on. Sequence of Events On 2nd November 2018, Mrs Annette Bell returned to the Committee as Events Manager after a break. Annette made it known to another Committee member that she would like to take the position of Vice Chair, vacant at that time. On 11th November Annette indicated to Dennis Balsdon that she would like to stand for Chair at the 2019 AGM as Dennis would not be standing for re-election. A vote was proposed and seconded. The vote passed and Annette would stand for Chair. On 15th November Dennis resigned as Chair and Annette became acting Chair by default. Dennis was proposed, seconded and voted in as a non-executive Trustee. Please note that Annette has NEVER been voted as a Trustee. On 20th November Annette nominated Flick Foreman to be vice Chair: quote ‘this matter is open to a Committee vote – a simple yay or nay is all that is required’. This first vote under Annette was not held correctly at her own instigation. While this may seem trivial at this stage you will realise the significance further down this document. At 15:09 on 20th November Annette was involved in a discussion on electronic media and proposed to call an SGM on 16th December to dissolve the CPS. In this discussion, Annette also ADMITS there is NO ALLOWANCE FOR TRUSTEES in the Governing Document. She also suggested the SGM would not have to be a physical meeting. An option she suggested was to form another charity and move all the ASSETS over – NO mention of the people. On 21st November Annette published a plan for taking the CPS forward. The plan included a motion to abolish the current rules and revert to the 1981 Governing Document. This document would be updated prior to the AGM and presented for acceptance by the membership. The plan made plain that we must operate legally. In this planning document, Annette called ‘for a simple vote to abolish the rules and revert to solely the Governing Document’. A very good idea, BUT this was the second vote incorrectly held under Annette. On 9th December Annette sent an email to the Committee ‘As you may be aware, Tim and Dennis have formally resigned as Trustees’. This was a great surprise to me as I communicated with Dennis quite often. Dennis informed me that Annette had requested his resignation and told him it was a Committee decision. This had NEVER been discussed in Committee or voted upon. Annette was not telling the truth to Dennis. 11th December. Annette released to the Committee the results of the member survey. This showed that 62.63% of members responding valued the Charity status as important. 20th December. Annette had ‘three companies lined up to give us a quote for a new website (starting with two home visits first week of Jan)’. We know that the website needs to be updated and the whole Committee is keen to see this done. This represents a very large financial commitment. We had a meeting to discuss a general plan but, without further consultation, Annette has taken this on as far as asking for quotes from companies that she has unilaterally selected. There has been no sitemap agreed by the Committee, no auditable due diligence (required in any organisation for such a large capital expenditure) and no agreement about budgets. To date, the Committee has not been notified of any progress in this matter. We haven't even been told the specification for it despite numerous requests for information. 31st December. A complaint from a member whose membership had lapsed some three years previous; that the seed they received was not labelled. 14th January 2019. Choices for the Forum were debated so Annette formally asked the Committee if the CPS should ‘ditch the shackles and reform as a sociable, grower’s society’. Note the word ‘society’, NOT Charity. Finally, we had been asked if we should exit Charity status. It was pointed out to Annette that under the Governing Document the Society could not cease to be a charity at law. If the CPS is taken out of charity status – dissolved – then the assets ‘shall be given or transferred’ to another charity ‘with the approval of the charity commissioners’. At this point, it was suggested to Annette for the first time that the Committee seeks a legal opinion. 15th January. On Messenger, Annette wrote ‘I think we should fold as a charity and re-emerge as a society. We can under charity law donate our money to another society or cause with a similar aim. Our new society fits that’. Quite clear evidence of Annette wanting to make the assets go somewhere else. In this conversation, Annette was advised to get ‘proper legal advice'. 24th January. Flick Foreman informs Annette she is resigning. 28 minutes later Annette requests Flick to sit on it as she is not ready. 25hJanuary. A complaint of seed not growing true. These seeds were sent out in October 2018. The propagator is needed to ensure compliance with Trading Standards and to protect the reputation of the CPS. 27th January. Fiona Wowra, Secretary and Seedbank organiser requested the purchase of a small propagator in order to test grow seeds and prove viability and species. This would clear us with Trading Standards if a complaint was made. All plants grown could be sold to recoup costs. Fiona was prepared to cover the electricity costs herself, this was in response to another complaint being made as to the type of seeds sent from the seed bank. 7th February. Flick Foreman resigned. Annette comments ‘I am so sorry to hear this, you will be missed’ Annette heard it on 24th January. Deception? I don’t know BUT NOT RIGHT. 8th February. Trustee and Treasurer Phil Wilson received a letter from Annette requesting his resignation as a Trustee. The letter was dated on 6th February. Phil called for a Committee vote on his resignation. You can imagine the surprise when a vote for Phil to resign is received from Annette’s MOTHER, Mrs Hayes, who is not a Committee member. Annette tried to laugh this off as a mistake in sending her mother the wrong email. As the email from Mrs Hayes was sent directly to the Committee email forwarder this could not be a mistake. The only way for this to happen was for the recipient to be copied, or blind copied into the email discussion. Annette breached the trust of the Committee and members by sending emails to non-Committee members. If a Trustee cannot be trusted then there is no room for them within the CPS. The Committee received an email from Annette with an attached letter to the Charity Commission. In this letter, Annette alleges numerous illegalities and failings by the Committee. Ignoring that she has been on the Committee for quite some time she blamed every other person. Annette also declared that by having only two Trustees we were inquorate and unable to function. This declaration has been proved to be untruthful in a recorded telephone call – recorded with permission – to the Charity Commission. The ruling document is our Governing Document. As there is NO MENTION of Trustees in that document it DOES NOT MATTER how many Trustees we have. The RECOMMENDED minimum is three but that is not a legal requirement. At the same time, Annette declared that, apart from mid-progress transactions, ALL financial transactions are not allowed and that the bank account was frozen. This meant that we were not allowed, by Annette, to send seeds, memberships or other products IN CONTRAVENTION of Trading Standards thereby placing the CPS against the law. 9th February Flick rescinds her resignation in disgust at Annette. Annette refuses to reinstate her on the Charity Commission website. 12th February. Dennis rescinds his resignation as he felt he has been misled. Dennis asked to be reinstated but this has not happened. Annette forwards this email from Dennis to Mr David Tite. Mr Tite is NOTa member of the CPS let alone a Committee member. Pure and simple GDPR breach which Annette claims to be for advisory purposes. NO. NOT LEGAL. During this time the Committee and remaining Trustee have made numerous requests for information from Annette but all we get is NO. To certain members of the Committee, she would send messages similar to ‘I will make a statement this afternoon but I need to go shopping first' or ‘news today, promise'. In another electronic conversation, Annette says ‘Dennis needs to allow change is what I mean, not just move aside into events to keep an eye that we run things his way. I'm nobody's lapdog'. Annette also claimed that the CPS had been placed into Special Measures (‘Under Review’) and that she has the authority of the Charity Commission to create an interim board of Trustees to run the CPS. In a permitted recording of a call the Charity Commission they have confirmed THIS IS NOT TRUE and they have NO RECORD of the Society being placed under ‘Special Measures’. Because of this claim, she has registered four other people as new Trustees. They were appointed without the knowledge or involvement of the one remaining legitimate Trustee, Phil Wilson or indeed brought before the committee for their consideration or endorsement. There was no discussion, no consideration, no evaluation; it was just presented as a fait accomplis. Whilst they may or may not be suitable as Trustees, this is not the point under question. Their appointment is NOT LEGALbecause new Trustees can only be appointed with the agreement of the existing Trustee(s). Because she acted alone, without taking due diligence into account, their tenure is highly questionable and dubious. We keep asking for documentation from Annette to prove what she says. She will not or cannot provide it. How can anyone believe her? A vote of no confidence in Annette was passed by a significant majority of the Committee on Monday 4th March; this included votes from persons whom Annette claimed to have supported her. An extract of an email from one of those ‘supporters’ sent to the Committee by Annette on 4th March shows no date and no header. When was it written? Why not forward the email and therefore show the date and timestamp? The options expressed in this extract were obviously no longer valid as that person voted in favour of the motion of no confidence. People are always entitled to a change of opinion. On 6th March, Phil Wilson wrote to Annette Bell ‘The commission recommend that where a charity has internal disputes that it seeks mediation through an official arbitrator.’ ‘I would like to go to mediation with you.’ ‘Go to mediation, get a result that we both have to accept and we can move forward.’. There was NO response from Annette. Annette has claimed that no records of votes, minutes of meetings etc. are available, this is NOT TRUE. The records have been sent to the Charity Commission as proof, in a serious complaint. If YOU, the member, wish to see these minutes or comment on the content of this statement with either support or criticism, please email [email protected] and quote your name and membership number. We are taking legal action and have registered a serious complaint with the Charity Commission. A full report is being compiled for submission to another legal entity with a request for action. Signed on behalf of and with the authorisation from your Committee, Ron Satterthwaite Membership Secretary. [email protected]
  8. 5 points
    I made this some years ago. I'm sure you will agree it turned out rather nice.
  9. 4 points
  10. 4 points
    pinguicule alpine + alpine all red pinguicula poldini hi Fabrizio
  11. 4 points
    These 6-7 years old, seed grown plants forming nice clumps and are free flowering from March till the start of the summer.
  12. 4 points
    Does anyone think Annette will have the nerve to actually turn up at the AGM? I will certainly be backing the long standing and hard working committee.
  13. 4 points
    Thank you Dennis and Ron for the detailed account of events. Interesting to read, but a bit sad that its come to this position. I do hope it gets sorted swiftly and, like ada, hope the society come out stronger from this. Probably some important actions to address as soon as this is over.
  14. 4 points
    I must have missed the fb post,but would be interested to see what is going off. It's always been good to get things out in the open to stop Chinese whispers and get both sides so everyone gets a fair chance to have their say. Ada
  15. 3 points
    13th ICPS Conference May 22−24, 2020 Himeji, Japan Himeji Castle. Cropped image from photo © Corpse Reviver / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 GFDL. The ICPS Conference 2020 will be held in Himeji City, Hyogo Prefecture from Friday, May 22 to Sunday, May 24, 2020. The city is renowned for Himeji Castle, a world heritage site that proudly represents the beauty of Japanese castles. Also, there is the Hyogo Prefectural Flower Center in the vicinity (about a 45-minute drive), which has a world-class carnivorous plant collection. Himeji is accessible from Kansai International Airport or from Tokyo by “Shinkansen” bullet train. The 3-day conference will be held at a conference facility known as “Biz Space,” located a 7-minute walk from Himeji Station and within walking distance of several major hotels. The lectures will cover a wide range of topics such as scientific/academic research, horticulture, conservation, etc. We are planning to bring in English-Japanese interpreters so that more Japanese members can participate in the conference. Plant displays and sales booths, including a Japanese top-class CP nursery, will be available in the same building during the conference. The conference banquet is to be held on May 23 or 24 at a near-by restaurant, where you can enjoy a good mix of Japanese and Western cuisines together with an impressive nighttime view of Himeji Castle. On May 25, we are planning a special day trip to the Hyogo Prefectural Flower Center. We will be guided through the amazing collections of Nepenthes, Sarracenia, and other carnivorous plants in the spectacular carnivorous plant greenhouse as well as the backyard. You will be meeting the giant N. clipeata and N. pervillei that were introduced in the 2018 ICPS conference. On May 26, we will enjoy an excursion to see the local habitats of Drosera rotundifolia, D. tokaiensis, and D. lunata, and maybe a few Utricularia, and then a trip to Tokyo for an overnight stay. On the following day (May 27), we will visit the habitat of Pinguicula ramosa, the Japanese endemic butterwort, on Mt. Nyoho, Nikko City. Note that it might be too early to see the flowers. Details including dates of the field trips will be finalized shortly. The 2020 ICPS Conference will be hosted by the three Japanese CP societies: The Japanese Carnivorous Plant Society (JCPS), The Carnivorous Plant Exploration Society (CPES), and The Tokai Carnivorous Plant Society (TCPS). These 3 societies mainly cover the Kanto, Kansai, and Tokai regions, respectively, and have been collaborating with each other and contributing to the prevalence and awareness of carnivorous plants in Japan. More information on the conference will be posted when it becomes available. We are looking forward to seeing you in Himeji in May 2020!
  16. 3 points
  17. 3 points
    Hi thought you might like a pic of d. modesta v donaldii. Enjoy. Dennis
  18. 3 points
    Vegetarian sundews: Few people know, that carnivorous plants like also vegetarian diet, as long as it is rich in protein like flower pollen. To show this, we fed fresh stamens of a Sarracenia leucophylla with adhering pollen to four different Drosera species (photos). D. capensis and D. ultramafica rolled in the leaf as intensive as with animal prey. D. capensis x aliciae moved at least the surrounding tentacles to the protein pack and the tentacles of D. schizandra, which does not show any leaf movement even with mosquitoes, clearly dock on the pollen portion, enjoying the meal.
  19. 3 points
    Hi In recent years we have moved the End of Season Meeting from RHS Wisley to Birmingham. Initially attendancce was very poor but we now get around 30. The fact that the majority of members live in the South of England means that it is sensible to hold the AGM there rather than (say) the North of England where we have few members. Of the committee, 2 live in SW England, 4 in SE England, 1 in Manchester, 1 in Derbyshire, 3 in Wales and 1 in Ireland. For me to attend the AGM entails a 400 mile round trip. I haven't missed an AGM for 30 years. Dennis
  20. 3 points
    This sounds like the community that I signed up too. Many thanks to everyone that makes it so, not been around here long but already I have been to events at Kew, Wisley and to a few of the great nurserys we have in this country. There's been adventures enjoyed, much more to be had, new friends made. The army grows. I look forward to the future :) Dean
  21. 3 points
    Might be the best AGM in years if Annette attends! Will be standing room only.....
  22. 3 points
    I remember a few years ago going to a Kew open day where not many people turned up. But while waiting to go in a couple of the committe members who did not not introduce themselves but spent the whole time bad mouthing other committe members. Not a very impressived show! And had seen similar siturations at a CPS Reading meeting. Been in too many clubs and societies where Big Name members or organisers seemed to more important than the ordinary member... So hopefully any changes will be for the better not more of the same just with different people!
  23. 3 points
    new rules to run the society better are welcome at any time,but who has been accused of what? names please,proof? many of the people who give their time freely are genuine people trying to do a job,many miles apart from others and getting together can be awkward. I'm all for moving forward and modernising but totally against being dictated to by one person or a committee ran by the old friends network when you don't know who is pulling the strings. The problem is anyone who takes any position has to make decisions that won't suit all people,all of the time. Then the bickering starts and that's why anyone with any sense keeps well out of it,so in the end its everyones fault and we get what we deserve. and the answer is NO. ada
  24. 3 points
    That.'s a very dark plant Mike. Let me correct you though,the plant you mention from insectanfang was actually bred by me. It is one of 4 plants I grew out from a batch of seed I pollinated,I sent AIDAN a piece to see how dark it would go,my conditions are not perfect for colouring up but this plant showed potential! I will try a piece outside this summer,if we get one nice enough.we get a lot of cloud most summers and our temperatures are,nt great either that,s why we grow undercover to try and get the best from our plants in a very short growing season. AIDAN lives in the USA now,I. M sure he,d let you use the picture if you ask him. ADA
  25. 3 points
  26. 2 points
    Hi here’s some watercolour paintings of lowii and veitchii, the pieces are up for sale if anyone is interested.
  27. 2 points
    I repotted my selenicerios grandiflora into a ten inch pot this year and it has rewarded me with eight flowers opening together.
  28. 2 points
    Dear all, here is the list of lectures on EEE 2019 in Prague. The lecture day will be Saturday and the first lecture will start at ten o'clock, so you won't have to wake up that early to catch them ;-) 10:00 - 11:00 - Tomáš Hájek - The fate of peatbogs during the dry years and their future in the changing climate 11:00 - 13:30 - lunch break 13:30 - 14:45 - Oliver Gluch - Winter flowering Pinguicula species - impressions from natural habitats in Mexico 14:45 - 16:00 - Jan Schlauer - The Quinones of the Queensland Sundews 16:00 - 17:15 - Lubomír Adamec - Ecophysiological characterization of aquatic carnivorous plants: are they different from terrestrial ones? The Sunday is dedicated to a trip to BG Liberec, which is a birthplace of CP fascination in former Czechoslovak Republic. Its director wrote the first book about CPs in 1984 and the popularity among growers lasts till the present day. Hope to see you in Prague! Adam
  29. 2 points
    Some of the nicest vulgaris I have seen, and quite a range of colours as well in Scotland today.
  30. 2 points
    I know that these are the commonest CPs going and everyone has seen them before, but this is the first time I have looked closely at these since growing CPs, and I recon I have learnt a lot. I was here for the geology, not the plants and only encountered D. rotundifolia and P. vulgaris but their occurrences interested me. There were almost none of either in bogs along streams or around larger ponds- I think these had too much sheep dung input and so too high in nutrients as they were filled with other bog plants. Most were in small bogs in depressions surrounded by rocks with very little stream input. The Drosera were almost all growing on Sphagnum or rarely other mosses I saw none on pare peat. It seems there were more in the lower, wetter parts but bigger plants were slightly higher and drier. I saw no Pings growing on Sphagnum and most were on bare peat, the exceptions were on a quarry wall where some were growing on non-Sphagnum mosses or onto almost bare rock.
  31. 2 points
  32. 2 points
    Small amounts of mineral salts in the water can gradually build up in the peat from all the water evaporation, so it's a good idea to repot every few years.
  33. 2 points
    It's doing fine so I'd leave it in the pot it's in and not divide it yet. Although they prefer to be repotted every two to three years for fresh soil so if you can it would benefit from it but it's not crucial this year I think. Also, try to put it in the sun. They like as much sun as they can get. You can't go OTT with it. If you're repotting it and moving it's location to full sun then I would nip out the flower stalks this year.
  34. 2 points
    Sown in summer of 2012 and flowering for the 4th or 5th time now.
  35. 2 points
  36. 2 points
    Pinguicula chuquisacensis is growing in the Bolivian Andes at 2200-2500 m.
  37. 2 points
    There has been a facebook post outlining issues, some serious, within the CPS committee. The post also provided corrective actions that have been proposed. However, the post also indicated that differences of opinion with a number of current committee members. Rather than respond in facebook I thought CPUK may be more appropriate. A) Could the membership be fully informed of the reputed issues? B) I would like to see the views of those accused of bringing the CPS into disrepute? C) I would like to see the proposals in detail for the corrective action with timescales? I've been a member for a long time. I'm as keen as everbody else to see this sorted but transparency and member backing are essential for this, and the society, to suceed. Cheers
  38. 2 points
    When I organised an EOS for Birmingham... 1 member attended. When its booked for the South, we get around 50+ members.
  39. 2 points
    I will put this suggestion to the rest of the committee, Dunc.
  40. 2 points
  41. 2 points
    Hi Dunc, Ye, very sad and totally unexpected. Ron
  42. 2 points
    Admin note: I've merged the two topics relating to this matter together in their entirety. Anyone can post. Forum rules (2004) apply.
  43. 2 points
    2019 turns out to be a good season for the largest catapult-flypaper trap. The catapults fling prey in 75 milliseconds, faster than the VFT. Now, the plants are flowering nicely at our greenhouse.
  44. 2 points
    Nepenthes In Rawang. Nepenthes Mirabilis. Nepenthes Mirabilis x Gracilis. Random Mutt. Habitat shot. Video. Some conditions I noticed in Rawang. The soil was pure clay It was 99% humid Best plants got the highest humidity and brightest light. All the foliage was wet.
  45. 2 points
    A new album from my recent expedition to Guyana - we managed to "bite into" the Guyanese Tepuis and savannas a little deeper ;) After about 1,5 yrs of preparations, planning and struggling to get the ministry-approved permits to visit the Indigenous areas the project came into fruition and we were able to visit the lovely community of Paruima, close to the Venezuelan border. The expedition succeeded in reaching the Guyanese outreach of the Gran Sabana around Uchii Falls and completing the second exploration of the summit of Waukauyeng Tepui after the 1997 Smithsonian expedition. On the summit - new confirmed distribution of Heliamphora heterodoxa. The album will be updated regularly, also feel invited to check out my Instagram profile: https://www.instagram.com/mateusz_explority/?hl=en https://flic.kr/s/aHskN1tbMk Regards
  46. 2 points
    I like to show you my Tom Thumb. I received from Carl in 2018. @ Carl. As soon as the weather is getting warmer I send you the Giant Dr. König.
  47. 2 points
  48. 2 points
  49. 2 points
    Echinopsis 'Tango' a plant I bought a good few years ago at Abbey Brook nursery and flowers reliably.
  50. 2 points
    Visit to Redleaf exotics on April 14th, 2018~ I have a ton more photos im just too lazy to edit them all I will be going to the ICPS conference this year - hope to see some of you fellow plant nerds there! Nepenthes (ventricosa x sibuyanensis)-giant x {[ventricosa x (spathulata x lowii)] x trusmadiensis} ‘EP’ Nepenthes (ventricosa x sibuyanensis)-giant x {[ventricosa x (spathulata x lowii)] x trusmadiensis} ‘EP’ Nepenthes truncata x [(veitchii x maxima) x veitchii] ‘EP’ Nepenthes veitchii 'candy dreams' truncata x jaq some really nice pitcher, but I cant tell if its just a really nice truncata or a hybrid ;) flava x sib Sorry for so much lowii - you know me