Hi Jonathan
I posted on the pitcherplant forums (http://www.pitcherplants.proboards34.com/index.cgi). I'm almost certain you have taken photographic evidence of a
glabrata hybrid or an entirely new taxon. I went against a direct
maxima parentage because the whole plant, including the pitcher appearances do not match. Here's why:
1) Leaves of
maxima and
eymae are strongly petiolate, whereas this plant's leaves are as sessile as can be and clasping. Had you taken photos of plants in their rosette stage and their pitchers, I could add more, had they been present.
2) Pitcher morphology:
i) lid shape is orbicular as opposed to narrow, especially for aerial pitchers - lid shape defines the shape of the pitcher opening when it opens (take
inermis, for example). In this case, the pitcher is fully inflated and the lid covers the mouth entirely;
ii) lid underside is missing glandular crests, or even remnants thereof;
iii) peristome isn't substantial enough to warrant it direct
eymae and
maxima parentage, even if they belong to aerial pitchers.
I'm sure there's more I could say, but I'm limited on time for the moment so I'll leave it at that. As a final note, I believe this potential* taxon will be greatly sought after if and once it enters cultivation through legitimate methods - it is indeed endowed with very attractive upper pitchers!
Cheers
Amori
* Thanks Aidan for pointing that out. It seems I've been using the term taxon incorrectly!
This post has been edited by Amori: 10th February 2008 - 00:09 AM